Skip to main content

Conflict and harm are inevitable within democratic social movements. In a pair of columns for Interactions by the Association for Computing Machinery, Rachel Kuo and her coauthors explore the role endings and dissolutions play in research and social organizing. In “The Institutional Capture of Abolitionist Dissent: Ending Genres of Police Science,” Dr. Kuo and coauthor Mon Mohapatra argue for abolitionist movements as a framework to end research that reproduces systems of violence:

“A body of scholarship has emerged on the new machinery of policing, such as predictive analytics, data surveillance, and body cameras. This research uses methodologies drawing on police data, sources, and perspectives as primary source material. These methods do not sufficiently reject the role of policing, instead assimilating the source of violence by configuring police as the solution for police brutality.”

In “Lateral Violences: Speculating Exit Strategies within Movements (A Concept Note)“, Dr. Kuo, Mon Mohapatra, and Rigoberto Lara Guzm├ín explore how planning for endings, exits, pauses, and dissolutions strengthens the long-term viability of social movements:

We can anticipate lateral violence by remembering that networks, like all energy configurations, have a life cycle: emergence, when principles and values are established, then growth and maintenance, which emphasize capacity building, and finally, the ending of a network, which may create new offshoots.

Browse the Issue
Comments are closed.